Andrew Shaver is the founding director of the Political Violence Lab, which has supported research on sub-state conflict by scholars at Dartmouth, Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, the University of California, San Diego, the University of Chicago, and Yale. The lab has involved the participation of 84 graduate students, post-graduates, and undergraduates across Dartmouth College, Princeton University, and five University of California campuses.
Learn more at PoliticalViolenceLab.com
Conflict Exposure and Civilian Attitudes
What are the effects of conflict exposure on civilian attitudes? This project explores how the attitudes of Baghdad citizens who were exposed to intense level of insurgent violence during the construction of the Sadr security wall differed from fellow citizens who were largely insulted from such violence.
Drone Warfare and Insurgency Outcomes
This research project seeks to assess the effects of suspected drone strikes on different insurgency outcomes -- from the types of targets and weaponry militants employ to the flow of information to counterinsurgent forces.
Media Bias in Wartime Reporting
Much political science research is based on the use of datasets of violent conflict constructed from news reports. Using detailed data from the recent Iraq and Afghanistan wars, this project explore sources of bias in media reporting within conflict zones and their effects on conflict event datasets.
Threat of Terrorism
How significant is the threat of terrorism within the United States? This project specifically explores the likelihood of large-scale terrorist attacks and the implications for policy.
How do armies learn? One challenge for armies facing insurgents is how to adapt their organization, doctrine, and equipment to guerrilla war. This project explores learning by doing during counterinsurgency and has direct implications for policy decisions on the duration of combat deployments.
The Data Science of War
Unlike wars of earlier generations, the economic, political, and social contexts of many modern conflicts are being documented in painstaking detail. Whether collecting satellite imagery, mining social media, or georeferencing individual wartime attacks, various parties are amassing datasets of remarkable spatial and temporal precision. This project explores how data are being used to test old assumptions of what leads to victory, defeat, or stalemate.